Vultr 主机跑分测评

小手一抖入了个新的服务器,折扣算下来才 30 元半年,应该是最便宜的 KVM 主机了。
性能到底有多强劲还是来测试一下就知道了~

价格:5 刀 1 月
虚拟类型:KVM
机房位置:东京
IP: 45.76.54.219 & 2001:19f0:7002:1298:5400:01ff:fe70:77e5
其他信息:已开启 BBR

查看更多主机跑分测评来进行横向对比,请点击:<https://hzy.pw/p/tag/vps-test>

测试结果仅能代表当时的服务器水平,受网络、机房的影响可能会与实际情况有差别。

网络测试 SpeedTest

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Virtual CPU 714389bda930
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 2399.998 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 24.5 GB (1.2 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 1004 MB (23 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1021 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days 0 hour 4 min
Load average         : 0.05, 0.01, 0.00
OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
Arch                 : i686 (32 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.9.0-6-686-pae
Virt                 : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M )     : 238 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M )    : 348 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G )      : 454 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 346.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name         Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency
Normal Node       210.90 Mbit/s     1275.19 Mbit/s      3.105 ms
Xiangyang CT      7.52 Mbit/s       6.96 Mbit/s         213.338 ms
Kunming   CT      65.79 Mbit/s      0.34 Mbit/s         000.000 ms
Chengdu   CT      10.87 Mbit/s      1.49 Mbit/s         000.000 ms
Shenyang  CU      108.65 Mbit/s     2.74 Mbit/s         459.454 ms
Xi'an     CU      42.69 Mbit/s      35.40 Mbit/s        233.721 ms
Shanghai  CU      4.61 Mbit/s       0.41 Mbit/s         343.232 ms
Chongqing CU      24.93 Mbit/s      14.47 Mbit/s        440.306 ms
Xi'an     CM      212.38 Mbit/s     517.64 Mbit/s       104.228 ms
Shandong  CM      6.10 Mbit/s       88.12 Mbit/s        100.858 ms
Chengdu   CM      167.44 Mbit/s     34.01 Mbit/s        108.101 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time   : 4 min 56 sec
Current time : 2018-04-03 15:59:18
Finished!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

西安电信 iperf3 60s

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-60.00  sec  32.2 MBytes  4.50 Mbits/sec  2544             sender
[  4]   0.00-60.00  sec  28.4 MBytes  3.98 Mbits/sec                  receiver

硬件测试 UnixBench

Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 03 2018 16:04:21 - 16:32:36
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       19115820.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2749.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3267.5 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        254944.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           69647.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1212420.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              385403.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 106070.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               7136.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5899.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    763.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1741339.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19115820.8   1638.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2749.8    500.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3267.5    759.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     254944.0    643.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      69647.8    420.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1212420.0   2090.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     385403.5    309.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     106070.4    265.2
Process Creation                                126.0       7136.0    566.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5899.3   1391.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        763.2   1271.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1741339.1   1160.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         753.9

结论

虽说是知名主机的 KVM 日本机房,但网速不敢恭维。(虽然我有推广链接,但必须得要实话实说才行)
原因可能是用的国人太多了吧。我用的是日本机房,等会尝试测试一下其他机房。

当然,性价比相当的高。作为大公司的主机,适合用来日常建站,服务稳定而且控制面板的功能完善。关键是作为 KVM 价格相当讨喜。$2.5/M,并且充值 $5 送 $25(请使用Paypal而不是支付宝),也就是 30 人民币用一年,简直划算炸了。

购买链接:<https://www.vultr.com/?ref=7382108>
通过这个链接购买,你我可以获得奖励金。

附录

附 vultr vps 全球 15 个机房的测试下载地址,还可以直接 ping:

Location
地理位置
Hostname
官方测试服务器
Download Test File
下载测试文件
(Asia)Tokyo, Japan hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
(Asia), Singapore sgp-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
(AU) Sydney, Australia syd-au-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
(EU) Frankfurt, DE fra-de-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
(EU) Amsterdam, NL ams-nl-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
(EU) London, UK lon-gb-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
(EU) Paris, France par-fr-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Seattle, Washington wa-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Silicon Valley, California sjo-ca-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Los Angeles, California lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Chicago, Illinois il-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Dallas, Texas tx-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
New York / New Jersey nj-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Atlanta, Georgia ga-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb
Miami, Florida fl-us-ping.vultr.com 100Mb 1000Mb

 


下一页是未开启 BBR 时的测试数据。

分页 : 1 2
0 条评论
发表一条评论